Public facilities are managed in general directly by the administration, yet public interest
might require sometimes mandating such facilities management to certain people instead of
the administration, which is applicable in compulsory contracts. Thus, the administrative
contract is similar to any other contract because it states equally commitments and rights of
the contract parties. On the other hand, while the administrative contract is linked with
public facilities and concerned with providing such facilities services to the public, the
contract impacts might affect a non-signing party. Such impacts mark a deviation from the
relativity principle known in the administrative law.
We are concerned to reach an understanding of the third party in the administrative contract,
know the key aspects of the administrative contract impacts on them represented in the rights
they acquire and duties they have to fulfill. In addition, this paper will discuss the judiciary
role in protecting the third party, preserving their rights and interests within the
administrative contract framework signed between the administrative entity and the
contracted party.
As a result, this dissertation includes an introduction, and a chapter one in which concept of
the "third party" and the relative administrative contract impacts are explained. The second
chapter shall explore legal position of the third party in the administrative contract in terms
of rights they acquire and workload they bear in such contracts. I will explain in the last
chapter the key judiciary protection aspects mandated to the third party as per the
administrative contract.