الملخص الإنجليزي
Every contractor has a responsibility to be vigilant when finalizing a contract. This
responsibility is founded on the belief that each contractor is best placed to evaluate
their own goals and interests, and is therefore best equipped to protect and advocate
for them. The contract is a receptacle of conflicting interests and differing objectives
for its parties, so each party should hold themselves accountable before blaming the
other. In legal practice and doctrine, it has been established that a contracting party's
error will not render the contract invalid or terminated if it is an inexcusable error
resulting from negligence or a failure to investigate the truth. The study of
inexcusable error aims to clarify its definition, its connection to the pre-contractual
behavior of the parties, its evidence, benefits, limitations, prominent applications,
and its role in achieving a balance between sound will and the principle of stability
in transactions. The study finds that the concept of inexcusable error is not an
afterthought to the theory of error, but rather a crucial condition for applying this
theory. Maintaining the contract in the case of an inexcusable error is not a form of
compensation, but rather an acknowledgment of the absence of a reason to nullify
the contract, indicating the absence of legal error despite its existence in reality.
