The study seeks to find out the legal rules that determine the evidence as the proof in the financial cases. This study is so important that it is indispensable for each judge to use the evidence to prove and distinguish between the complainant and the defendant. It is necessary to establish rules to control, to address what is emerging from them and to determine their validity in the evidence, such as the electronic signature, and legal texts used for proving. The dissertation is made up of an introduction (Preamble) and two chapters. The introduction defines the meaning of the controls and the evidence and the difference that exists between them. In addition to the importance of the evidence as a proof. The first chapter deals with the types of evidence and the importance of bearing witness. The second chapter deals with evidence, witnessing and endorsement which are the written and electronic evidence and also the presumption of possession. The study came up with the statement determining the necessity of considering the evidence and how to use it in the appropriate way whenever it is needed and the cases of right prevention. The study came up with the following results: 1- The officer of the evidence of Nukul: the concerned person refuses to swear by Allah when asked without a valid excuse that prevents him to perform it resulting in considering him guilty and in rejecting his case if he was complainant. 2- The evidence of keeping silent: silence kept by the defendant in the court to defend himself after asking him to do so without having a legal excuse for his silence is a clear evidence for proving the right of the complainant. 3- The evidence of listening to witnesses: two or more trustworthy witnesses certify that they heard people who are no longer alive saying that a particular property was given to a particular party or shared between different people or given to Muslim House of Treasury. 4- The Evidence of the Accredited Custom Editor officer: each document handwritten and signed intended to commit himself to other's right. 5- The evidence by electronic signature: the concerned person is obliged to respect his financial commitments toward 6-others through his electronic account which is accredited and protected by any authority is his country certifying that his account is not hacked. Officer of tenure in the property: he who has acquired a property claiming its ownership and has been acting as its real owner by changing its characteristics, demolition or building for ten years without any complaint from the part of the complainant whose case will be rejected after the overdue time.