This study meant to cover the authentic and non-authentic hadiths that were put in the two chapters of authentic hadith, weak and rejected hadith for Albani, using the method of statistical stylistic analysis, a topic whose problem is based on the fact that the rejected hadiths were fabricated hadiths that were made and developed in ways similar to the methods of authentic prophetic hadith in order to mislead the Islamic nation. The study sought to track the stylistic phenomena associated with paraphrasing and related to the presentation of meaning and related to the reserve of meaning in the authentic and rejected hadiths, and to uncover convergences in employing stylistic phenomena in the correct and established hadiths, and to reveal aspects of the spacing. In order to achieve these goals, we analyzed 3242 authentic hadiths and 1853 rejected hadiths which are the authentic said hadiths that are included in ALbani series after excluding hadiths that are not of these two tapes and the divine and repeated hadiths. We have found in this study that dialogue, verbal correlation with the denominator of communication, summarization and detailing, style of preference, verbal assertion, and declaration rather than referencing are various stylistic phenomena the hadiths sought to imitate them as they appeared in the authentic hadiths and the percesntages of these stylistic phenomena are close to the correct and established hadiths, except for the phenomena ف associated with paraphrasing the difference between them was significant in favour of authentic hadiths, and that there is a set of convergences and a set of spacing aspects in the employment of stylistic phenomena on both sides, that the convergences are often in the generalities of stylistic phenomena, and that the spacings are often in the subtle details of the creativity associated with the creators. It became clear to us that the situation was important in what he hadiths, with two things, one or both: persuasion, and amazement. As for persuasion when he wants to interfere with what does not exist, as for amazement, when he wants to distract the students of the hadith from his facts to others.