English abstract
This study meant to cover the authentic and non-authentic
hadiths that were put in the two chapters of authentic hadith, weak
and rejected hadith for Albani, using the method of statistical
stylistic analysis, a topic whose problem is based on the fact that
the rejected hadiths were fabricated hadiths that were made and
developed in ways similar to the methods of authentic prophetic
hadith in order to mislead the Islamic nation.
The study sought to track the stylistic phenomena associated
with paraphrasing and related to the presentation of meaning and
related to the reserve of meaning in the authentic and rejected
hadiths, and to uncover convergences in employing stylistic
phenomena in the correct and established hadiths, and to reveal
aspects of the spacing.
In order to achieve these goals, we analyzed 3242 authentic
hadiths and 1853 rejected hadiths which are the authentic said
hadiths that are included in ALbani series after excluding hadiths
that are not of these two tapes and the divine and repeated hadiths.
We have found in this study that dialogue, verbal correlation
with the denominator of communication, summarization and
detailing, style of preference, verbal assertion, and declaration
rather than referencing are various stylistic phenomena the hadiths
sought to imitate them as they appeared in the authentic hadiths
and the percesntages of these stylistic phenomena are close to the
correct and established hadiths, except for the phenomena
ف
associated with paraphrasing the difference between them was
significant in favour of authentic hadiths, and that there is a set of
convergences and a set of spacing aspects in the employment of
stylistic phenomena on both sides, that the convergences are often
in the generalities of stylistic phenomena, and that the spacings are
often in the subtle details of the creativity associated with the
creators.
It became clear to us that the situation was important in what
he hadiths, with two things, one or both: persuasion, and
amazement. As for persuasion when he wants to interfere with what
does not exist, as for amazement, when he wants to distract the
students of the hadith from his facts to others.
