English abstract
Research Subject: "Analogy of resemblance with the Ibadism and its
jurisprudential applications (Usuli study and Jurisprudential)".
The researcher's research goal is to study the analogy of resemblance with
Ibadism and its jurisprudential applications (Usuli study and Jurisprudential) and to
indicate its types, conditions, jurisprudential applications, and role in forming
preferences of opinions; this is accomplished through an introduction and three chapters,
each of which includes sections and subsections.Then, the study ended with a conclusion
and recommendations.
In the introductory chapter, we talk about the definition of Qiyas ("analogical
deduction") and its types in Ibadism. This chapter is divided into two sections: the first
discusses Qiyas "analogical deduction" in the language and Ibadism terminology, and
the second discusses Qiyas evidence and types at Ibadism, concluding that an analogy of
resemblance is classified as a type of Qiyas, along with analogical deduction and
inferred analogy.
In the first chapter, the researcher dealt with the analogy of resemblance. The
chapter is divided into four sections: the first one is about the definition of the analogy of
resemblance and the terms related to it; the second section deals with the evidences of
the analogy of resemblance; the third section touches on the types of the analogy of
resemblance; and the last section deals with the analogy of resemblance conditions.
In the last chapter, the researcher dealt with jurisprudential applications. You may
notice there is an expansion on the discussion of jurisprudential issues. This expansion is
deliberate in order to investigate whether it can be used as a method of preference
between evidence and opinions.
One of the most important results of the research was a statement and editing of
the concept of analogy and the analogy of resemblance. The Ibadism considers the
analogy of resemblance by conditions, which we can use as a method of preference
between evidence and opinions.