Document
Comparing handline and trolling fishing methods in the recreational pelagic fishery in the Gulf of Oman.
Identifier
DOI: 10.3989/scimar.04864.10A
Source
Scientia Marina. v. 83, 3, p. 215-222
Contributors
Paighambari, Seyed Yousef., Author
Bayse, Shannon M., Author
Other titles
[Estudio comparativo de pesca pelágica recreativa entre las artes de línea de mano y curricán en el golfo de Omán, Irán]
Country
Spain
Publisher
CSIC Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas.
Gregorian
2019-01-01
Language
English
Subject
English abstract
The choice of fishing gear and catching strategy should be taken into consideration in the management of fish stocks. Here, paired fishing trials in a pelagic recreational fishery compared the catch composition, catch rate and size selectivity between handline and trolling fishing methods in Iranian coastal waters of the Gulf of Oman. Total catch rate was 1.06 fish hr–1 vs 0.88 fish hr–1 for handline and trolling, respectively, a 17% difference which was significant (p0.05). Generally, the handline method captured more fish than trolling for most species, but size selectivity tended to be species-specific per gear type. The handline fishing method captured larger talang queenfish (Scomberoides commersonnianus), while trolling captured larger narrow-barred Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus commerson), pickhandle barracuda (Sphyraena jello) and Indian threadfish (Alectis indicus). Technical measures, such as gear restrictions, could be applied to recreational pelagic fisheries management in the Gulf of Oman. Such measures could improve species-specific exploitation patterns.
ISSN
0214-8358
Category
Journal articles