Talking about alliance, coalition, and coexistence goes far beyond talking about tolerance, understanding, and dialogue. So that the latter can be seen as tools or mechanisms? From here, the question of disapproval and exclamation arises, how can we justify talking about the coalition when we did not agree on those tools or mechanisms and their conditions, controls and caveats, rather we did not agree on them as principles?! There is no doubt that the coalition is a (utopian) value that may be impossible, but we - in spite of that - we must strive or try to strive for it. It (the coalition) is more like a distant goal, and if we look at it as part of the ladder of values, then it is the high, lofty step that we may not be able to reach, but that - again - does not or should not prevent us from making every effort to achieve it. ; Because the mere striving towards adulthood may remove many of the high and thick walls that destroy the bridges between man and his fellow man, as if the coalition or belief in it in itself is a kind of fuel or motivation that provokes or mobilizes; In order to aspire to that dream, please realize it with effort and work for peace.