The study examines the discourse strategies used by the Prophet’s Hadith in dealing with a dispute and deciding on it, while considering the different circumstances of the disputants and the nature of the disputed issue. We seek to answer a major complication related to the nature of the strategies used in the context of the judiciary, taking into account the necessity imposed by this context to regulate the principle of deliberation, the different point of views occurred in the confrontation between opponents, and the guarantee of fair litigation that this confrontation entails. The problematic question can be formulated as follows: What is the impact of the judicial context on the use of discourse strategies in the Prophet’s hadith to resolve conflicts? The research aims to know the characteristics of the legal language and use it in analyzing the prophetic speech. It also describes the language of Islamic judiciary and analyze it by explaining the types of strategies of the Prophet’s speech in the context of litigation. In addition, it studies the tools of prophetic speech strategies used in the judicial context and its role in clarifying rulings. The study is based on the methodological tools provided by the pragmatic approach of discourse analysis that takes into consideration the circumstances of discourse production and the context of its circulation. The construction of the used strategies is built upon general determinants of the following criteria: the form of the discourse, the relationship between the addressees, and the goal of the discourse. Accordingly, the study consists of five main chapters in addition to the introduction and conclusion. In the first chapter (Strategies of Discourse and the Language of the Prophet’s Judgment), we discuss the concept of discourse analysis and its determinants, the strategies of discourse, the concept of the language of the judiciary and the description of the general features of the Prophet’s Judgments. We have devoted the rest of the chapters to studying the four main strategies. In the second chapter, we describe the concept of the Directive strategy and explore its most important related concepts such as the concept of authority with practical models from the linguistic code according to the tools used. As for the third chapter, we explained the concept of Persuasion strategy and its relationship to arguments and its forms with the most prominent applied models. We devoted the fourth chapter to the Indirect strategy in terms of describing its concept and analyzing applied models of the prophetic judicial discourse. In the final chapter, we discussed the Solidarity strategy in terms of the concept and the moral dimension of the discourse with an analysis of its tools within the linguistic code’s models.