Public facilities are managed in general directly by the administration, yet public interest might require sometimes mandating such facilities management to certain people instead of the administration, which is applicable in compulsory contracts. Thus, the administrative contract is similar to any other contract because it states equally commitments and rights of the contract parties. On the other hand, while the administrative contract is linked with public facilities and concerned with providing such facilities services to the public, the contract impacts might affect a non-signing party. Such impacts mark a deviation from the relativity principle known in the administrative law. We are concerned to reach an understanding of the third party in the administrative contract, know the key aspects of the administrative contract impacts on them represented in the rights they acquire and duties they have to fulfill. In addition, this paper will discuss the judiciary role in protecting the third party, preserving their rights and interests within the administrative contract framework signed between the administrative entity and the contracted party. As a result, this dissertation includes an introduction, and a chapter one in which concept of the "third party" and the relative administrative contract impacts are explained. The second chapter shall explore legal position of the third party in the administrative contract in terms of rights they acquire and workload they bear in such contracts. I will explain in the last chapter the key judiciary protection aspects mandated to the third party as per the administrative contract.